Existing exports, not implementation-first
Qavoryn begins with masked or redacted exports rather than direct production-system access or a new platform implementation.
About Qavoryn
Built to make project-billing gaps visible, explainable and actionable.
Qavoryn is an independent Project Billing Evidence-Control diagnostic for IT services, consulting, custom software and project-based companies.
We review one workflow using existing business exports, connect delivery evidence to billing and payment records, and turn control gaps into evidence-linked findings, root causes, owners and practical actions.
No ERP access, bank access or system integration is required to begin.
Qavoryn operating model
Evidence before action
- EvidenceSource records, status, confidence, and gaps
- Control decisionFinding treatment, owner, exception, and boundary
- Responsible handoffReviewed action, prevention point, and next control step
Service model
Analyst-led diagnostic
Action boundary
Client validation required
Why Qavoryn exists
Project revenue can be delayed between systems, teams and handoffs.
Delivery evidence may sit in one tool. Scope changes may remain in email or project notes. Approved hours may not reach the invoice. Expenses may not be recharged. Milestones may be accepted without being billed. Payments or disputes may remain without a clear owner.
Most operating systems show their own part of the workflow. Qavoryn was created to independently connect the available evidence across one project-billing workflow and show what is supported, what still needs validation, who owns the next decision and where a control may be missing.
What Qavoryn does differently
Independent evidence review, not another operating system.
One workflow at a time
The first engagement is deliberately narrow, usually Project Billing, Milestone Billing or Scope Change to Invoice.
Conservative treatment
Gross signals, overlap, review-only items and net-counted findings remain separate rather than being presented as recoverable revenue.
Action and control handoff
Findings connect to evidence, root causes, missing controls, accountable owners and next actions.
How we work
Operating principles for evidence and action.
PRINCIPLE 01
Evidence before claims
Findings link to available source evidence and identify where that evidence is incomplete.
PRINCIPLE 02
Conservative before inflated
Potential exposure, overlap, review-only value and net-counted findings remain distinguishable.
PRINCIPLE 03
Validation before action
The client validates findings before operational, financial, billing or recovery action.
PRINCIPLE 04
One workflow before expansion
The engagement begins with the smallest useful scope and expands only when evidence supports a next step.
PRINCIPLE 05
Control before automation
Automation recommendations follow evidence, ownership and decision clarity rather than preceding them.
The people behind Qavoryn
Founder-led commercial and technical delivery.
Qavoryn combines commercial workflow thinking with technical diagnostic execution. The founders divide responsibility across product, operations, client delivery, SQL rule logic, reporting and implementation.
CEO and Co-founder
Zhaleh Danesh
Zhaleh leads Qavoryn's commercial direction, product strategy, operations and client-facing work.
Her focus is translating project-delivery, billing and payment evidence into clear business findings, ownership decisions and practical control actions. She leads Qavoryn's market positioning, client discovery, workflow scoping and the development of outputs that finance, delivery and management teams can use.
- Commercial and product direction
- Client discovery and workflow scoping
- Project Billing Evidence-Control methodology
- Findings, control and action-pack design
- Go-to-market and client relationships
- Responsible Impact positioning
CTO and Co-founder
Liam Danesh
Liam leads Qavoryn's technical architecture, SQL diagnostic engine, rule implementation, Power BI outputs and technical delivery.
He is currently completing a Bachelor of Information Technology at the University of Technology Sydney in Sydney, Australia, majoring in Business Information Systems Management and Data Analytics. His academic background supports his work in translating Qavoryn's evidence-control methodology into rerunnable diagnostic logic, traceable findings and manager-ready reporting.
- Technical architecture and system design
- Qavoryn diagnostic engine and SQL implementation
- Diagnostic rule logic and data-quality controls
- Power BI and reporting outputs
- Business information systems and data analytics
- Website and technical delivery
What clients receive
Designed to move from evidence to action.
The output is designed for internal review, challenge, ownership and controlled follow-up.
Revenue Evidence Report
Findings Register
Gross-to-Net Bridge
Root-Cause and Control-Gap Map
Evidence Register
Action Tracker
Preventive-Control Recommendations
Manager Handoff Pack
Evidence handling
A scoped, agreed route for client evidence.
Initial conversations require no confidential records. If a Sprint proceeds, the evidence set, approved transfer method, access responsibilities, retention period and deletion expectations are confirmed before files are transferred.
contact@qavoryn.comClear boundaries
Qavoryn provides evidence and control diagnostics for internal review and action. It does not provide formal audit opinions, accounting, legal or tax advice, guaranteed recovery estimates, ERP or bank integrations, replacement operating systems, or generic AI-agent implementation.
Responsible Impact
Qavoryn maintains a lightweight Responsible Impact approach to consider how selected workflow-control actions may support themes such as economic resilience, responsible resource use, innovation infrastructure and accountability. This is a supporting internal evidence framework. It does not imply United Nations endorsement, certification, partnership or formal sustainability assurance.
Start with one project-billing workflow.
The Free 15-minute Initial Fit Call confirms whether the workflow, available evidence and likely control gaps justify a deeper review.